2025 Legislative Recap

Idaho’s 2025 Legislative Actions, Explained

From banning Pride flags to classroom censorship, restricting facilities, and redefining “indecency,” Idaho lawmakers doubled down on anti-LGBTQ+ legislation this year.

We’ve broken it all down—what passed, what didn’t, and what it means.

Bills that passed

  • Sponsors: Ted Hill & Tammy Nichols
    Effective Date: July 1, 2025

    Overview:
    This law limits which flags can be displayed in public schools, restricting them to a narrow list of “official” flags under the guise of neutrality.

    Key provisions:

    • Bans flags that reference race, gender, or sexual orientation

    • Applies to classrooms, hallways, and other school spaces

    • Does not apply to patches, pins, or flags displayed inside personal vehicles on school property

    Enforcement:

    • No enforcement mechanism is specifically listed in the bill

    • Leaves implementation up to individual districts or administrators without clear guidance

  • Sponsors: Barbara Ehardt & Tammy Nichols
    Effective Date: July 1, 2025

    Overview:
    This law changes how public schools handle education related to sexuality and gender identity by expanding the scope of what qualifies as “human sexuality” instruction.

    Key provisions:

    • Adds a definition of “human sexuality” that explicitly includes gender identity and sexual orientation

    • Requires parents or guardians to opt in before a student can receive any instruction on these topics

    Enforcement:

    • Allows parents or legal guardians to sue a school district’s board of trustees if instruction is provided without prior written consent

  • Sponsors: Dale Hawkins & Cindy Carlson
    Effective Date: July 1, 2025

    Overview:
    This law expands Idaho’s “Don’t Say Gay” policies, restricting LGBTQ+ visibility and support in schools.

    Key provisions:

    • Requires schools to notify parents of any known change in a student’s mental, emotional, or physical health—including when a student comes out or seeks support for gender identity

    • Prohibits any instruction on sexual orientation or gender identity

    • Applies to all K–12 grades (previously K–3 only)

    • Effectively erases LGBTQ+ people and issues from curriculum, discussion, and school-based support

    Enforcement:

    • Creates a private cause of action

    • Parents can sue school districts if they believe:

      • They were not properly notified of a student’s disclosure

      • Restricted topics were discussed in violation of the law

  • Sponsors: Ben Toews & Judy Boyle
    Effective Date: July 1, 2025

    Overview:
    This law dismantles Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) infrastructure in Idaho’s public colleges and universities.

    Key provisions:

    • Bans DEI offices, officers, trainings, and bias reporting systems

    • Defunds existing DEI offices and redirects those funds to merit-based scholarships

    • Eliminates DEI-related course requirements

    Enforcement:

    • Creates a private cause of action: any student or staff member can sue an institution for injunctive relief

    • The Attorney General can investigate and sue institutions for violations

    • Civil penalties of 10% of institutional funding or $50,000, whichever is greater, for each violation

    • Institutions must annually report all DEI-related activities (past and present) to the Attorney General and legislative education committees

  • Sponsors: Reps Josh Tanner & Douglas Picket
    Effective Date: July 1, 2025

    Overview:
    This law undermines Title IX protections by shifting authority and narrowing implementation requirements across Idaho’s colleges and universities.

    Key provisions:

    • Centralizes power by giving university presidents sole authority over Title IX investigations

    • Removes decision-making from trained Title IX staff and administrators

    • Requires that institutional policies only meet the minimum requirements of federal Title IX guidelines—limiting proactive protections

    Impact:

    • Politicizes Title IX processes and reduces accountability for addressing harassment, misgendering, and discrimination

    • Leaves queer and trans students more vulnerable on campus, with fewer options for support or recourse

    • Introduces indirect financial penalties for institutions that defy the law, although no explicit enforcement mechanism is outlined

Censorship, Schools, & Education

  • Sponsors: Barbara Ehardt & Cindy Carlson
    Effective Date: July 1, 2025

    Overview:
    This law targets trans people in designated single-sex spaces such as bathrooms, dorm rooms, and locker rooms.

    It applies specifically to:

    • Universities

    • Community colleges

    • Correctional facilities

    • Some domestic violence shelters

    • It does not apply to all public spaces.

    Enforcement:
    This law creates a private cause of action, allowing individuals to sue an institution up to two years after merely suspecting a trans person used a designated space.

    Key concerns:

    • No guidance on how such claims should be proven

    • No limitations on tactics used to "enforce" the law

    • Opens the door to harassment, surveillance, and retaliation

    • Could allow for inspections or invasive behavior with no legal guardrails

    • Sponsors: Reps Jeff Cornilles & Steve Tanner
      Effective Date: In Effect

      Overview:
      This is the first bill in Idaho to introduce criminal penalties that specifically target trans people.

      It expands the existing indecent exposure law to include chests, breasts, and prosthetics that resemble breasts or genitalia—language that disproportionately impacts trans and gender-nonconforming people.

      The law applies to any public space where another person is present and claims to be offended.

      Enforcement:

      • First offense: Misdemeanor

      • Three offenses within five years: Felony, punishable by up to 5 years in prison

      Important Clarification:
      A viral video has been circulating saying trans men who’ve had top surgery will be automatically added to the sex offender registry.
      That is not true.
      This bill is already harmful—but it’s important to stay rooted in fact as we fight back.

Public Space, Privacy, Surveillance

  • Sponsors: Bruce Skaug & Carl Bjerke
    Effective Date: In Effect

    Overview:
    This law allows health care providers to refuse care based on personal religious, moral, or ethical objections.

    Key provisions:

    • Applies broadly to prescriptions, mental health care, gender-affirming care, abortion, birth control, and fertility services

    • Covers all levels of personnel, including front desk staff, doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and insurers

    • Does not apply to emergency services like EMTs

    Enforcement:

    • Shields providers from lawsuits, professional discipline, or liability for refusing care—even if the patient experiences harm as a result

  • Sponsor: Marco Erickson
    Effective Date: Adopted (Resolution)

    Overview:
    This resolution formally rejects a national code of ethics designed to protect LGBTQ+ patients in genetic counseling.

    Key provisions:

    • Undermines professional standards that ensure non-discriminatory care

    • Allows genetic counselors to legally deny services related to:

      • Fertility

      • Prenatal screenings

      • Inherited conditions

    Impact:

    • Idaho lawmakers went out of their way to target this national standard

    • Encourages biased treatment against LGBTQ+ individuals seeking family planning or health screening support

Healthcare & Rights of Refusal

  • Sponsor: Heather Scott
    Effective Date: In Effect

    Overview:
    This law restricts government properties to displaying only a narrow list of “official” flags.

    Key provisions:

    • Applies to all state, county, city, and special-district buildings, parks, and facilities—from City Hall to Harrison Boulevard

    • Limits flag displays to:

      • U.S. flag

      • State of Idaho flag

      • Official city, county, or tribal flags

      • Military and POW/MIA flags

      • Flags of other nations for special occasions

    • Effectively bans flags that represent LGBTQ+ communities, racial justice movements, or other social causes

    Enforcement:

    The law does not include an enforcement mechanism, leaving implementation and compliance ambiguous

    Local Response:

    • In response to HB 96, the Boise City Council voted 5–1 to designate the Pride flag and the Donate Life flag as official city flags, allowing them to continue flying at City Hall

    • Mayor Lauren McLean emphasized that the Pride flag symbolizes Boise’s commitment to being a safe and welcoming city

    • The move was seen as a direct challenge to the state law, prompting Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador to send a letter warning the city could face consequences in future legislative sessions

  • Sponsors: Barbara Ehardt & Brent Crane
    Effective Date: Adopted (Resolution)

    Overview:
    This resolution was the second piece of legislation introduced in the 2025 session and explicitly targets trans women in collegiate athletics.

    Key provisions:

    • Praises Boise State University’s women’s volleyball team for forfeiting matches against San Jose State due to the participation of a trans athlete

    • Called on the NCAA to ban trans women from college athletics

    Impact:

    • Reinforced harmful stigma and misinformation about trans women in sports

    • Used legislative platforms to pressure national organizations into adopting discriminatory policies

    Update:
    On February 5, 2025, President Donald Trump signed Executive Order 14201, titled "Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports," which threatens to withhold federal funding from educational institutions that allow transgender women and girls to compete in women's sports categories.

    In response, on February 6, 2025, the NCAA announced a policy change restricting participation in women's sports to athletes assigned female at birth, effectively barring transgender women from competing in women's collegiate sports.

  • Sponsors: Joe Alfieri & Ben Toews
    Effective Date: Adopted (Resolution)

    Overview:
    This resolution designates the period between Mother’s Day and Father’s Day as “Traditional Family Values Month.”

    Key provisions:

    • Promotes a definition of family centered on a “natural” mother and father

    • Positions this definition as the ideal for raising children

    • Encourages the celebration of this model across public platforms and institutions

    Impact:

    • Implies that nontraditional families—including LGBTQ+, single-parent, and adoptive households—are harmful, despite decades of evidence to the contrary

    • Riddled with disinformation, relying on talking points and pseudoscience from far-right organizations with a history of anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric

    • Reinforces a broader agenda of ideological control over identity, care, and kinship

Symbols, Flags, & Visibility

Bills that didn’t passed

Marriage, Identity, Expression

  • Sponsor: Heather Scott
    Status: Introduced, but did not pass

    Overview:
    This was the first piece of legislation introduced in the 2025 session. It is a non-binding memorial aimed at challenging marriage equality.

    Key provisions:

    • Calls on the U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider Obergefell v. Hodges, the 2015 decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide

    • Frames the memorial as a defense of “states’ rights” over marriage policy

    Impact:

    • While symbolic, this memorial explicitly attacks the foundation of marriage equality

    • Part of a national effort to lay the groundwork for rolling back federal protections for LGBTQ+ people

    • 14 House Republicans voted against it, signaling some division within the party

    • The memorial was never heard in the Senate, but its introduction alone signals intent

  • Sponsors: Ted Hill & Edward Clark (Idaho Family Policy Center)
    Status: Introduced, but did not pass

    Overview:
    This bill sought to restrict access to performances—especially drag—by labeling them as harmful to minors and expanding government control over public expression.

    Key provisions:

    • Would have banned children under 14 from attending certain live performances, even with parental consent

    • Allowed prosecutors to preemptively shut down events based on speculation that content might be inappropriate

    • Created a private cause of action, allowing minors or their parents to sue venues over performances they deemed inappropriate—particularly those involving drag or gender nonconformity

    Impact:

    • Framed as a “child protection” measure, the bill was part of a broader effort to criminalize queer and trans expression in public spaces

    • Would have created a chilling effect on drag shows, queer events, and inclusive community performances

    • Empowered both the state and private citizens to censor and punish LGBTQ+ visibility through intimidation and legal threats

  • Sponsor: Vito Barbieri
    Status: Introduced, but did not pass

    Overview:
    This bill sought to restrict how and when changes can be made to birth certificates, with particular implications for trans and intersex people.

    Key provisions:

    • Required any changes to “material facts” on a birth certificate—including sex, birth weight, and length—to be made within one year of birth

    • Mandated that all amended birth certificates be permanently flagged with codes like “C1,” “C2,” etc.

    • Created a state-tracked record of every amendment, tying each change to the individual

    Impact:

    • Would have created a permanent government record of identity changes, threatening privacy and safety—especially for trans people

    • Invited surveillance and stigmatization of those who amend their birth records

    • Part of a national trend to reassert state control over identity documentation as a tool of social and legal policing

What You Can Do

Even in the face of these laws, you have options, rights, and community.

  • Misunderstanding helps these laws do more damage. Make sure you’re sharing accurate info. Always double-check your sources.

    If you have questions or want help understanding, reach out to us, the ACLU of Idaho, Planned Parenthood, or Legal Voice.

  • Even as the law changes, you still have rights. Organizations like ACLU Idaho, Lambda Legal, and the Transgender Law Center can help you understand and protect them.

  • Think critically about what’s stored digitally, who has access, and what’s shared—especially for trans folks and young people navigating hostile systems.

    Make copies of your records and store them in a safe place.

  • Whether it’s a game night or a protest, being in community keeps us safer and stronger. If you need help finding that, we’ll help you get connected.

    Email us at QueerDemsofIdaho@gmail.com

  • Grief, fear, rage, exhaustion—it’s all real. Rest when you need to. Ask for help. Find joy. We need you alive through this.

    You are not alone. Support is available.

    If you or someone you know is struggling with the impacts of these policies or needs support, help is available.

    • The Trevor Project: (866) 488-7386

    • Crisis Text Line: Text START to 741-741

    • Trans Lifeline: (877) 565-8860

    • The GLBT National Youth Talkline: (800) 246-7743

    • The GLBT National Hotline: (888) 843-4564

  • Leaving doesn’t make you less brave or less committed. Do what keeps you safe.